Secrets of the Templar occultism. Rituals of the Templars How the secret was made obvious

The Ceremony of Stale Air is a ritual performed during initiation into the sixth degree of the Order of the Knights Templar. It celebrates the awakening of the flesh and the negation of past errors, and also symbolizes rebirth through burial. The ceremony was invented in the thirteenth century.

In its original form it was not the historical parody that it later developed into. Reports of the execution of L'Air Epais ultimately strengthened the hand of King Philip IV of France in his campaign to destroy the wealthy order, which had been banned in 1331.

The Templars became familiar with the dualistic concept of the Yazidis in the Middle East. When they visited the Court of the Serpent and the Sanctuary of the Pheasant, where indulgence was synonymous with supreme power, they discovered a hitherto unknown glorification of pride and praise of life. As a result, they created what was destined to become one of the most important rituals of Satanism. Martyrdom, which had once been considered desirable, was now viewed with disgust and ridicule, and violent pride became for the world the last personification of the Templars. The philosophy of Sheikh Adi and the Yazidis, coupled with the accumulated wealth and manpower of the Templars, could well have led the West away from Christianity if the Knights had not been stopped. Even after the Templars were banned, their set of proud, life-loving principles, fused with Western goal-oriented materialism, did not sink into oblivion, as the history of any post-Templar brotherhood proves.

As the Templars gained strength and power, they became more materialistic and less spiritually concerned. Therefore, rituals such as Stale Air represented affirmations that were timely and acceptable to those who were turning away from their early heritage of self-sacrifice, abstinence, and mendicancy.

The fraternal bond represented by the performance of L'Air Epais would correspond to the thirty-fourth degree of Masonry, if such a degree existed. The modern Scottish Rite ends at the Thirty-second degree (Master of the Royal Mystery), to which an additional degree may be awarded for special merit. A corresponding status is achieved in the rituals of York Freemasonry at the tenth degree, which carries the title of Knight Templar.

Initially, Templar initiation into the Fifth Degree symbolized the candidate's passage through the Devil's Pass in the mountains separating the East from the West (the domain of the Yazidis). At the crossroads, the candidate had to make an important choice: either to maintain his current addictions, or to set foot on the Left Path towards Shambhala, where he would find an abode in the domain of Satan, rejecting the shortcomings and hypocrisy of the everyday world. A strikingly similar American parallel to this ritual was played out in the mosques of the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, an order for thirty-second degree Masons. The nobles gracefully evaded any accusations of heresy, calling the place beyond the Devil's Pass nothing more than the domain where they “worshiped in the sanctuary of Islam.”

L'Air Epais cannot be carried out without unrestrained blasphemy of Christian ethics, and so it was excluded from the Masonic rituals, thus stopping further progress beyond the Thirty-third degree in the Scottish Rites and the Tenth degree in the York Rites. The Order of the Rosy Cross of the people around Aleister Crowley makes an interesting comparison in their initiation into the Seventh Degree (Adeptus Exemplis). In this ritual, the alternative to the Left Path was the decision to become a Child of the Abyss, which is not as controversial and dubious as it might seem, given their often Machiavellian modus operandi. Crowley, far from being a stupid man, created a magical labyrinth with the goal that his students, whose consciousness allows them to follow the Right Path, would never be able to find themselves on the Left. Fortunately, very few and only the most worthy have reached the level of Adeptus Exemplis, thereby successfully preventing the problems that could arise from such gross spiritual shocks.

The overtly anti-Christian viewpoint presented in the Ceremony of Stale Air allowed informers against the Templars to classify it as a "Black Mass".

After initiation into the Sixth Degree, the candidate rejected any life-denying spirituality and recognized the material world as a prerequisite for the higher levels of existence. This is a statement of rebirth, the opposition of the joys of life to the non-existence of death. The initiate in the original version of L'Air Epais was represented as a saint, martyr, or other example of facelessness. This was done to emphasize the transition from self-denial to self-indulgence in everything.

The rebirth ceremony takes place in a large coffin. The coffin contains a naked woman, whose task is to awaken lust in the “dead man” who is laid next to her. L'Air Epais can serve two purposes - denial of death and dedication to life or blasphemy towards those who crave suffering, discomfort and nothingness. The initiate, who is essentially life-loving, can free himself from the urges of self-deprecation by willingly "dying" and thus banishing the self-destructive motivations with which he may have been endowed.

L'Air Epais is a ceremony in which a person overcomes the idea of ​​death and takes it out of his system, turning the instruments of death into instruments of lust and life. The coffin, the main ritual attribute, contains the personification of a force that is stronger than death - lust, which gives birth to new life. This echoes the symbolism of the coffin, which is present, albeit with a euphemistic touch, in most of the rituals of Masonic lodges. If the initiate has obvious masochistic tendencies, he can, through transference, become a surrogate for those members of the congregation who are endowed with the same traits. He experiences something worse than death when, inside the coffin, instead of the spiritual reward for which he had hoped, unexpected passions from which he had long abstained are presented to him. (If the initiate is a homophile, the coffin must contain another man. In accordance with all aspects ritual, the element of pleasure must be that which is most likely to be denied in the life of the initiate.) The most terrible punishment is always inflicted on the one whose abstinence has turned into indulgence. Hence the warning: the death of a chronic lover of discomfort is the reward of indulgence. In this case, this may serve as an interpretation of the common phrase “to destroy with mercy.”

When in later, memorial versions of L'Air Epais the initiate represented the "man of God", the ritual took on the mission of weakening the structure of the organization it represented. As Lewis Spence and other writers have noted, this factor introduces an element of Messe Noir into the ritual.

The name Stale Air implies both the specially created atmosphere in the initial stages of the ceremony and the intimacy in the coffin.

When the performance of L'Air Epais resumed in 1799, it was a celebration of the success of the curse imposed by Jacques de Molay, the last of the Great Knights Templar, condemned to death along with his Knights, on Philip and Pope Clement V. The following text includes the actual curse placed by de Molay on the King and Pope. Although the dialogue between the Priest of Satan, the King and the Pope is presented in modern literary French, de Molay's speech was left in the original stilted style.

The Nineteenth-Century Litany of the Devil by James Thompson The City of Dreadful Night has long been used as a Reproof. It is doubtful whether any other words would be better suited for this purpose. Fragments of the text can be found in Reinoir's drama Les Templiers of 1806.

Numerous manifestations of Satanism in Masonic rituals, such as a goat, a coffin, a skull, etc. may easily be euphemized, but the denial of certain values, which L'Air Epais demands, cannot be disguised by established theologies. By accepting this degree, the initiate enters the Left Path and chooses Hell instead of Heaven. In addition to being considered both ritual and ceremony, Stale Air is a memento mori at its most powerful.

The symbol of the cross is present in many religions of the world and is a basic element of faith. Orthodoxy also places him as a central figure and gives him many meanings and functions: protection and salvation from all evil. But there are also more ancient symbols of the cross, one of them is the Templar cross. It appeared long before the rise of Christianity and carries sacred pagan meanings.

Such an amulet can protect you from many troubles and give you the necessary strength if you use it correctly.

Historical meaning

Externally, the amulet looks like an equally rayed cross enclosed in a circle, which is a characteristic feature of Celtic symbolism.

Its historical significance is very broad and many-sided, since a similar symbol appeared many centuries ago, when Christianity had not yet been heard of on earth.

In its original meaning, the Templar cross signifies peace in its unity. Four equal rays speak about how the world works: the sun, earth, water and air are united in their totality and personify all life in our world. The Templar cross received its first name based on a similar interpretation of the amulet: the circle of the sun.

What connects the Templar cross and Christianity

Nowadays, the Templar cross amulet and Christianity are firmly connected, which is quite surprising, since such an amulet initially carries a pagan meaning, which is unacceptable for Orthodoxy.

On this score, there are two main theories about how the Templar cross could penetrate into the Christian religion:

• According to the first theory, the Celtic cross appeared as an alternative between the traditional Christian crucifix and the pagan symbol of faith. This innovation is attributed to missionaries, who thus wanted to simplify the introduction of a new religion to the Irish islands.
• According to the second theory, the Templar cross, which is a symbol of faith enclosed in a closed circle, passed into Christianity as a sign of endless faith in God.

Both theories are heavily criticized by specialists in religion and occult symbols, but the fact remains: the Templar cross is an amulet whose history goes back many centuries. This talisman has great power if used correctly.

Meaning of the Templar Cross

The intricate and long history of this talisman suggests that the meaning of the symbol itself is quite complex and multifaceted. The following main functions of the Templar cross can be distinguished:

• The unusual shape of the talisman helps to collect and accumulate creative energy, which can then be used by the owner of the amulet itself.
• Like many ancient symbols, such a talisman carries a powerful protective charge that can protect you from any external negativity.
• The Templar Cross will help you avoid evil-minded people and potential enemies.
• In addition, such an amulet contains a pentagram, which, as is known, is a powerful magical symbol. Because of this, such a talisman is often used in various magical rituals.
• If you constantly wear such an amulet, then good luck and success will accompany you in everything.

An amulet purchased in advance should be properly cleaned of foreign energy impurities, and then activated by investing a little of your energy into it. Then just carry it with you all the time, preferably as close to your body as possible.

Amulet of the Poor Templar

There is another type of Templar cross, which since the Middle Ages has been called the “amulet of the poor Templar.” This symbol was given such significance by its specifically designated role in a person’s life: to improve one’s financial situation.

This technique, even in past centuries, was not subject to wide publicity: it was used mainly by noble people who needed to increase their capital.

Making such an amulet for a poor Templar is quite simple; you just need to approach the ritual itself carefully and responsibly.

It is performed strictly on a strictly defined day and time: on the thirteenth lunar day, immediately after the sun sets below the horizon. You should not choose other days, as the effect of such an event will be too insignificant.

To make the amulet itself you will need:

A coin of any denomination, but always in the currency in which you need to make a profit.

• File.
• Fine sandpaper for polishing metal.
• Sharp needle.
• A sheet of white paper.
• Pencil.
• A sharp needle, preferably sterile.

First of all, you should make the talisman itself. To do this, use a file or similar device to remove the entire side of the coin on which its denomination is displayed. To do this, file down all protruding parts, and then carefully sand the surface of the coin.

All these actions are needed in order to then engrave on the prepared surface with a sharp needle the new value of the coin: it will be the figure that you need as an increase in capital. Be sure to sign the name of the currency under the new denomination, following one simple rule: the currency you write must correspond to the coin itself and the profit you want to receive. To put it simply, you cannot write dollar currency on a ruble coin.

Below the indicated amount, draw an inverted pentagram symbol.

If such procedures are difficult for you to carry out, then you can simply take the coin to an engraving specialist and explain in detail what needs to be done; this will not affect the outcome of the ritual.

After the poor Templar's amulet is ready, you should prepare and sign an agreement with higher powers to receive the amount of money you need. To do this, you should transfer a life-size image of your new mascot to the top of a white sheet of paper.

Below you should write the text of the contract being concluded:

“The powers of the black flame, give me the money I require, and I will always repay the debt.” “Spero meliora – quaerens, quem devoret – ab ovo – bis dat, qut cito dat. Cessante caussa cessat effectus – exceptis excipiendis.”

Both phrases should be written in your own hand without any marks.

Now all that remains is for you to put your signature at the bottom of the sheet of agreement. To do this, prick your index finger with a new needle and leave a bloody imprint of it in the right place.

When the agreement is signed, it should be burned in a candle flame, and the ashes should be carefully collected and dissolved in a glass of water. The resulting mixture should be drunk, only after this the ritual is considered complete.

From this day on, the talisman should be carried with you at all times, preferably in a wallet, as if it were an ordinary coin.

Have you often had the sad thought that life is passing you by? That all the good things in this life - luxury cars, expensive jewelry, luxurious resorts - all this is for others, and your lot is gray everyday life. Have you ever wondered why this happens? What is the difference between you and those lucky people who seem to jokingly storm the heights of life and casually receive everything that you can only dream of?

In the article:

Ancient Secrets of Wealth and Power

Well, since you are still reading, it means you want to manage your life yourself, know how the world really works, not expect favors from success, but command it. And we can help you with this.

Trying to earn wealth for yourself is like breaking into a closed door. As the experience of the most successful people on Earth testifies, the shortest path to success is to open money channels through which wealth will flow to you as if by itself. Of course, access to these energy channels is a secret, but secret does not mean inaccessible. As one ritual formula says, to be one – ask one. This can be translated as “ask who you want to be.” Let's turn to the rich for the secrets of wealth.

Freemasons have long been considered the recognized masters of financial flows - their wealth and power are legendary. For more than a hundred years, the founders of Freemasonry, the Knights Templar, served as faithful defenders of the Holy Sepulcher, won by the crusaders during the first campaign.

In 1291, ships heavily laden with eastern gold landed in European ports. But countless treasures are not the main thing that the templars brought from distant Judea. Jerusalem is the main magical place of the ecumene. It is here, in Jerusalem, that worlds, religions and cultures have always converged. Hellas and Egypt, Islam and Christianity, East and West converged at this crossroads of the universe, settling with knowledge enclosed in papyrus and parchment. Ancient magic, Egyptian occultism, ancient wisdom and oriental cunning, multiplied by knightly military power - this is the main wealth that the Templars brought to Europe.

Due to political intrigues, the Masonic Templars were forced to go underground, but despite this (or rather, thanks to) the organization not only retained its power, but also increased it. In any major political phenomenon in history, upon closer examination, a trace of free masons is revealed. After all, behind the Masonic lodges there is a huge layer of accumulated ancient knowledge, which allows one to achieve power, wealth and success. Real success, and not a puppet’s place on the stage of the world theater. To be convinced of this, just look at the banknote of the main world currency - the dollar. The green banknote bears Masonic magical signs that ensure the inviolability of the dollar financial system.

Many wanted to touch the magic of the Masons-Templars, however, the brother masons steadfastly guarded their secrets. But now you too have the opportunity to join the ancient power.

How to get Templar power

While preparing this material, we were able to meet a man of unique destiny. - a famous esotericist, white magician, for a long time occupied a prominent place in one of the Masonic lodges. Quite by accident, Viktor Nikolaevich purchased a chest with old books at a sale in Paris. While sorting out the purchase, he noticed an interesting symbol on one of the volumes. The cover was decorated with a rose and a cross - the coat of arms of the House of Rosicrucians, one of the most powerful Masonic orders.

All you need is to receive a personal Masonic formula - a ritual spell created in accordance with the signature of your biofield and focus on meeting your needs and desires. Also, you will become the owner of a personal amulet created in accordance with your Masonic formula to attract money and good luck. In addition, an action program for the near future will be created for you personally, which will help you avoid difficult life situations.

You may ask, why would a great magician want to enrich others? You are right - nothing in life is given for nothing, however, Masons do not pursue the goal of personal enrichment - they are already the masters of money. There is no need to pledge your soul either - Freemasonry does not pursue such goals. What is the benefit? everything is very simple - by distributing amulets, the brothers increase the energy of the Order, its power and influence.

But if the magician doesn’t need money, why can’t he get the formula for free? What is given for free will never be used for good. You must express your real interest in acquiring wealth and good fortune. A modest monetary contribution is a symbol of this interest.

Please also note that the Masonic formula is strictly individual; an amulet created using the formula for anyone other than its own owner will be useless at best.

The ritual of creating a personal Masonic formula takes about two weeks. You can find out about it on the website. The sooner you contact, the sooner the long-awaited changes will come in your life. Make your way to success, prosperity and wealth!

In contact with

Guichard de Marziac, the fourth witness, a 50-year-old Templar, said that in Toulouse he accepted a certain Hugh de Marchand into the order. After the initiation ceremony, the neophyte was “taken with him higher brothers and were kept for a long time in a carefully locked room.” Marchand left them pale, with burning eyes and completely beside himself. “The next day,” says Marziak, “I took him aside and asked him what was causing his excitement.” Marchand replied that this could not be told and that he would never know joy in his life. And from that moment on he was always sad.

Etienne de Nerca, a novice, stated that when his half-brother was accepted to the highest order of the Temple, he subsequently repented of this very much.

During the trial of the English Templars, three of them gave the following testimony: “In reality, there are two types of initiation rites in the order. The first occurs at the moment of acceptance into the order and does not contain anything reprehensible. The second initiation can take place only after several years have passed, only a few are awarded it, and this ritual is kept secret.”.

In his book “The Templars,” Gillette Sigle reports an interesting fact. While in England, the Grand Master gave a certain manuscript to the knight William de Pocklington to copy. Chaplain Gaspar de Noferton, who had been admitted to the order only six months before, was present. When he wanted to look into the text, the Grand Master snatched the manuscript from the scribe's hands and took it with him.

In his testimony, Brother Gaspard de Coche testifies that, while in Palestine, he more than once heard Grand Master Thibault Godin asking the brothers to hand over to him all the books related to the Charter of the order. He adds: “I heard, and I believe it, that he burned some books, gave others to the elders of the order, and kept some for himself.”

It seems that one phrase from the testimony of the Templar Goceran de Monpeza confirms the existence of such a secret Charter: “We have three articles that no one will know except God, the Devil and the masters.”

We will not dwell on the analysis of the text of the allegedly secret Charter, “discovered” in 1877 in the archives of the Grand Masonic Lodge in Hamburg. However, let us give one excerpt: “Here begins the Book of Fire Baptism, or the Secret Rule, compiled for the Consoled Brothers by Master Roncelenus.” It is stated that this document was signed by Robert de Samfort, procurator of the order in England in 1240. This is a historical person.

Of course, the term “comforted”, applied to brothers who received baptism according to the rite of Master Roncelin, attracts attention here. And it would be very tempting to see in it a hint of the rite of “consolation” that existed among the Cathars, but then we should be talking about a distorted version of this very peculiar rite, which could only be accepted by a person who, by the way of his life, was able to benefit from its fruits. Naturally, this does not apply to Templar warriors.

Continuing this thought, consider the allusion to prophet or false prophet role attributed to Jesus.

The Preceptor of Normandy, Geoffroy de Charnay, was accepted into the order by Amaury de La Roche. This is what he testified during interrogation: “Having accepted me into the order and placing a cloak on me, they brought me a crucifix. Brother Amory commanded me not to believe in the one whose image I see, for he is a false prophet and not God.”

But this was Amaury de La Roche, the closest friend of Louis IX, the future Saint Louis! Another Knight of the Temple made similar confessions during interrogation. The commander who led the initiation ceremony told him, when he refused in horror to spit on the cross: “Fear nothing, my son. This is not the Lord, not God. This is a false prophet."

Let's not forget that Roncelin de Faux, who during interrogations was credited with the role of spreading heresy in the order, was a vassal of the kings of Fr. Mallorca, subjects of the kings of Aragon. And they defended the Cathar heresy with arms in hand in 1213 at the Battle of Murat. Next door to his possessions was the city of Beziers, brutally destroyed by the crusaders of Simon de Montfort on July 22, 1209 during the Albigensian War (about 100 thousand killed). At the time when Roncelin ruled the order, this event had not yet been erased from people's memory.

Thus, it is obvious that two stages in the development of the Templar heresy should be distinguished. Undoubtedly, during periods of truce with Muslims, the Templars also had friendly contacts with them. Islam, as it is directly stated in the Koran, considers Jesus one of the seven prophets, the last before Muhammad, who revealed the highest truth. This concept, new to the Templars, who were mostly poorly educated people, existed in the first centuries of Christianity and was called Adoptianism. Supporters of the Adoptianist heresy were Hermas, Theodotus, Asclepiodotus, Hermophilus, Apollonides, Artemas and, finally, Paul of Samosata. They believed that Jesus was only the adopted son of God, a man chosen by God for a specific mission and guided by the Holy Spirit in carrying it out. This is the doctrine of the first period.

In the second period, the attitude of the Templars towards Jesus hardens and he becomes in their eyes only a false prophet. In their opinion, he lied when he promised the end of the world during the lifetime of those who listened to him; he lied about his second coming, which would mark the end of the world and the Last Judgment. From now on, for the Templars he is a false prophet. It is also possible that the Templars communicated with rabbis or with the leaders of the Ismaili sect of Assassins, who expressed ideas for them that the Templars had nothing to object to.

It is also possible that they encountered the Yazidis, a once numerous people whose remnants live today on Mount Sinjar in Iraq. The Yazidis worshiped Malakitauz, the peacock god, an incarnation of Lucifer. Like the Armenians, they retreated into the mountains, pressed by both Muslims and Christians. Naturally, for religious reasons. The Yazidi religion comes from ancient Aryan beliefs. It bears the imprint of Zoroastrianism and, naturally, is dualistic, binary. All this could seduce some leaders of the order and give them the idea of ​​creating Secret inner circle, a special level of initiation. At the first, preparatory, the neophyte was only required to renounce the divine essence of Christ.

This hypothesis can be confirmed, as it seems to us, by the secret ritual of the second stage of initiation into the order, which included kiss on a previously bare shoulder;“in the shoulder, in the naked flesh...”, as Brother Geoffroy de Tatan testifies. And another knight, Jacques de Troyes, goes even further: “in the naked flesh, in the shoulder and in the ass...”.

And Abu el-Kassem Mansur, nicknamed Ferdowsi, a Persian poet of the 10th-11th centuries, tells us in his poem "Shah-Nameh, or the Book of Kings" grandiose historical and legendary epic of Iran, a strange legend. One Arab prince named Zahhak made a pact with Iblis, the devil. The devil killed Zahhak's father, placed him on the throne, helped him conquer the vast Persian Empire and kill its king Jamshid. However, he asked permission to kiss Zahhak on the shoulder blades. He agreed. And immediately two black snakes grew from Zahhak’s shoulder blades, which had to be fed every day with the brains of young boys. For this payment, the snakes became Zahhak's guards and allowed him to rule Isfahan for nine centuries. It was from him that the Yazidi tribe originated.

The devil Iblis appeared to Zahhak in the form of a peacock with a loose tail. And Christians and Muslims blamed the Yezidis, worshipers of the peacock god in that they exchange ritual kisses with certain snakes, and also indulge in sodomy, homosexuality and incest. Their king, upon ascending the throne, killed his predecessor in the same way as Zahhak did. They, like the Templars of the secret circle, had a ritual kiss on the bare shoulder. It is obvious that this ritual is associated with symbolism caduceus, a wooden rod, around which, like around Zahhak’s spine, two snakes were intertwined.

However, let us recall that all the Templars who reported that underwent a secret initiation ceremony, and spoke of several higher levels in the order, They have always confessed only to their renunciation of Christ. If they were adherents of another religious teaching, no one admitted it.

However, if such a teaching existed, it was revealed to a person gradually, as he passed through higher levels. And we know nothing about them. We only know that there was a ritual of renunciation of Christ, once introduced by one of the leaders of the order. And we know that this ritual had to have serious grounds in order to be accepted in that era thoroughly permeated with the Christian faith. It seems that we have managed to discover its true origin.

Official seal of the Grand Master of the Knights Templar

The official seal of the Knights Templar, which existed until 1146, when Pope Eugene III granted members the exclusive privilege of wearing the red cross on their shield, camisole and cloak

The seal of the so-called Secret Temple, which depicts the Gnostic Abraxas (Abraxas is a mythical creature with a human face, a rooster’s head and snakes instead of legs. — Note ed.) - symbol of God the creator

In fact, it is very likely that the Assassins or Jews could have shown the masters of the order an excerpt from Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, which are still known today.

In addition, it should be noted that all the manuscripts of this author stored in libraries date back to the 9th or 11th centuries. They are the works of famous monastic scribes. It can be assumed that the texts were subjected to preliminary verification and correction by church censorship. But this passage miraculously escaped it, which makes it even more valuable.

However, before we begin its analysis, it should be recalled how the concept is defined syllogism in classical logic. In the medieval scholastic triad, logic was considered the science of correct reasoning. Pascal believed that logic obviously borrowed its laws from geometry. One of the key concepts of logic is a formula called syllogism. A syllogism is a proposition consisting of three sentences, the last of which, consequence, is contained in one of the first two sentences, while the other confirms that it is contained in it. These three sentences are called as follows:

— large package, containing the predicate of the consequence;

— smaller package, containing its subject;

— consequence, or conclusion, containing the output itself.

To better understand the syllogism, here is a small example:

Large package: All Indians are redskins.

Smaller package: Geronimo, the Apache leader, is an Indian.

Consequence: Jeronimo was a red man.

Logic teaches that if a syllogism is correctly composed and if the major and minor premises are proven, we are obliged to accept the consequence as proven.

Let us now consider an excerpt from Josephus Flavius' Antiquities of the Jews, book. XX, V, 2.

Cuspius Fado was succeeded by Tiberius Alexander, son of Alexander, the former Alabarch of Alexandria, who surpassed all his contemporaries in wealth and nobility of birth. And with his faithfulness to the Lord, he surpassed even his son, who betrayed the faith of his fathers. During this last period, there was a great famine, and Queen Helena bought grain from Egypt at a high price to distribute it to the inhabitants. At the same time, the sons of Judas the Galilean were executed, who incited the people to revolt against the Romans when Quirinus conducted a census in Judea. Their names were Jacob and Simon. Alexander ordered them to be crucified on the cross.

Note that the name Jacob, or in Hebrew Jacob, in Greek it was pronounced Jacobos, in Latin - Jacobus and in French - Jacques.

Execution on the cross of two sons of Judas the Galilean, who was also called Judas of Gamala (named after his hometown) or Judas the Golonite (named after the province from which he came) and who is mentioned in the Acts of the Holy Apostles ( Bible. Acts of the Holy Apostles (V, 37). — Here and below are references to the publication: The Bible. Books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. Anniversary publication dedicated to the millennium of the Baptism of Rus'. Publication of the Moscow Patriarchate. M., 1988) , occurred in 47 AD. e., since Tiberius Alexander succeeded Cuspius at the end of 46, and Ventidius Cumanus succeeded him at the end of 47.

Let us now take the life of the Apostle Paul. He stands out as an apostle in 45. His first missionary journey lasts a little over a year. In 47 he is in Jerusalem. Naturally, one should not demand from the “Acts of the Holy Apostles” a strict chronological presentation of events - they are not a truly historical work. Here, every now and then, angels appear and disappear, the shackles fall off the prisoners on their own, just as the doors of the dungeons open, and the eunuch of the Queen of Ethiopia, baptized by the Apostle Philip on the way to Jerusalem, soars into the air and lands only in the city of Azoth, at forty kilometers from there! All this, of course, is not serious. The fact remains that in 47 the Apostle Paul was in Jerusalem. In his Epistle to the Galatians we read the following: “Then, three years later, I went to Jerusalem to see Peter and stayed with him for fifteen days. I have not seen another of the Apostles no one except Jacob the brother of the Lord" (Paul, Epistle to the Galatians. 1.18 19).

It is known that Peter (a Greek word meaning "stone") was the nickname of Simon, who became Simon-Peter. So, in 47 in Jerusalem, Paul sees only Peter and James (Simeon and Jacob in Hebrew). But aren't these Simon and James-Jacob the two that Josephus writes about? We must answer this question in the affirmative.

Indeed, Judas of Gamala, or Judas the Galilean, was the leader of the Jewish Integrists who created the party zealots However, we find confirmation of this in the Gospel: Simon-Peter also bears the nickname Zealot.

“Simon, called the Zealot, Judas Jacob and Judas Iscariot, who later became a traitor” (Bible. Gospel from Luke, VI, 15-16).

“...Peter and James, John...Jacob Alpheus and Simon Zealot and Judas, Brother James" (Bible, Acts of the Holy Apostles, I, 13).

This Simon has other nicknames: barhonna, which means “outlawed” (and all Zealots were such in the eyes of Rome); or Canaanite, from the Hebrew word "hana" which means "obsessed", "fanatic" and where the Greek word "zealot" comes from.

This same Simon was the father of Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Christ:

“This He spoke of Judas Simon Iscariot” (Bible. Gospel of Joanna, VI, 71).

“Then one of His disciples Judas Simonov Iscariot, who wanted to betray Him..." (Bible, Gospel of Joanna, XII, 4).

Therefore, there is no longer any doubt. Simon Peter (Greek for “stone”) and James, “brother of the Lord,” were the ones crucified by Tiberius Alexander in 47 AD in Jerusalem.

And they are both sons of Judas the Galilean, who led the rebellion against the census. And Jesus is their elder brother. This can be judged from the words of the Apostle Mark: “Is this not the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, Josiah, Judas and Simon? Are His sisters here among us?” (Bible, Gospel of Brand, VI, 3). And the fact that he is the eldest of the brothers is proven by another passage from the Gospel: “After eight days, when it was necessary to circumcise baby, They gave Him the name Jesus, which the Angel called before He was conceived in the womb.

And when the days of their purification according to the law of Moses were fulfilled, they brought Him to Jerusalem to present Him before the Lord, as it is prescribed in the law of the Lord, that every male child who opens the ( Lozhesna - mother's womb. — Approx. ed.) , was dedicated to the Lord..." (Bible. Gospel ofLuke, II, 21-23).

We find confirmation that we are talking about brothers in the literal sense of the word in the most ancient copies of the Gospel known to us - Sinaiticus And Behold the Vatican, dating back to the 4th century. The term used here "adelphos", meaning "brother" in Greek - but not cousin (Greek "anekhnos"). At St. Jerome in his famous Latin Vulgate, which the Catholic Church considers the officially recognized text of the Gospel, the word is also used frater(brother) and never - consorbinus(cousin).

First conclusion: Jesus' brothers are his full brothers and in no way cousins.

The second conclusion: they are not his brothers from Joseph’s first marriage, since he, offering an atoning sacrifice for firstborn, demonstrated that Jesus is such. After all, a person made such a sacrifice only once in his life.

So we have shown that Jesus was the elder brother of Simon the Zealot and James, and thus the uncle of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon.

However, this Simon the Zealot and James, the brothers of Jesus, were in fact the sons of the head of the Zealot party, Judas the Galilean, as reported by Josephus, who cannot be suspected of having second thoughts.

The third conclusion: Jesus, therefore, is the eldest son of the same Judas the Galilean, and that is why in the gospel stories, however, already contradictory and confused, this militant rebel - the father - is hidden under the name of a fictional character, the humble Joseph, the very one whom Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant interpreters of Holy Scripture call him the “good old man.”

Here is another discovery.

For the elder could not marry a virgin, since it was assumed in advance that he was either sterile or impotent. In this case, Jewish law prescribed divorce within two weeks.

And finally, we have the right to assume that the wonderful library kept in the citadel of the Assassins - the Alamut fortress - could have a copy Gospel of Bartholomew or that one of the chaplains of the order could have come across it somewhere in Palestine, with some rabbi, for example. And this is the Gospel in a Coptic manuscript of the 5th century. contains a message of exceptional importance: Jesus apparently had a twin brother! Judge for yourself: “He talked with them in Hebrew, saying: “Hello, my esteemed bishop, Peter, hello, Thomas, my second Christ"".

This passage is taken from the Coptic Apocryphal Gospels, translated by Dr. E. Revillou, published by Firmin-Dido. It should be noted that the name “Thomas”, which one of the apostles bears, is nothing more than a corruption of the Hebrew word "taoma" meaning "twin brother". Excerpts from Acts of Thomas(V century): " Twin of Christ Apostle of the Most High, you are also initiated into His secret teaching, you are also invested with a secret mission” (XXXIX); “Come, O holy power of the Spirit! Come, sacred Dove, conceiving twins! Come, O hidden Mother” (I).

One can imagine what a revolution was made in the souls of the Knights of the Temple, many of whom had previously been excommunicated from the church for various reasons, by this information, which was slowly revealed to them by ignorant chaplains just like them: “Jesus is the son of a partisan leader, he had twin brother…".

So, it is very likely that it was precisely this kind of arguments, gleaned from the Assassins or educated Jews, that gradually led the leaders of the order to the idea of ​​​​rejecting the teaching, which henceforth became false in their eyes.

Perhaps the emergence of the Templar heresy was also influenced by Frederick II of Hohenstaufen (1194-1250). King of Sicily, Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, he had a reputation among his contemporaries as an extraordinary person. Today we consider him the first representative of the Renaissance. An expert in French, German, Latin, Greek, Arabic and Hebrew, interested in everything in the world, a patron of the sciences and arts, he created a magnificent oriental courtyard in Palermo, where Christian, Jewish and Arab sages gathered. He also wrote the famous pamphlet “Three Liars,” which states that Moses, Christ and Mohammed brought more sorrow to the world than happiness.

It was he, and not his namesake, who lived in the 17th century. and who was friends with Voltaire, is the “Frederick II” of some of the higher degrees of Freemasonry.

The presence in the order of many knights who came from the Cathars or had previously been excommunicated for heresy, blasphemy and sacrilege also contributed to the rapid spread of the practice renunciation, conditioned by everything that was said above.

But the question arises: was it dedication in the full sense of the word? Yes, it did.

Genuine tantric ( Tantrism is one of the directions in Hinduism, characterized by a significant amount of mysticism and magic. — Approx. ed.) the initiation, which occurs on the first full moon after the winter solstice and is renewed at each new moon, involves the breaking of three taboos: food, sexual and religious. It is this tantrism that merges with the so-called “Buddhism of small steps,” which, according to Hindus, was created by the “atheist Buddha” himself. It's about authenticliberationnecessary to go “beyond” the slavish dependence on customs, religious prejudices and the despotic army of clergy. Since a person connects with God only through his consciousness. His heart contracts with fear, and only his consciousness makes a decision.

Naturally, simple Cathars did not go as far in their quest for the Absolute as the “perfect” ones. And it is very likely that even those Templars who received a more or less complete understanding of Manichaeism did not go beyond a very primitive and clumsy understanding of it.

May the reader forgive us for citing in this book, which we consider serious, an excerpt from the magnificent epic “The Damned Kings” by Maurice Druon. Although this is a historical novel, in the book “The Lily and the Lion” we find a magnificent example of that primitive Manichaeism that inspired the rebellious peasants and the downtrodden serfs when they gathered for their Sabbaths.

“Kneeling on the bed, with her hands on her hips, so that a shadow fell on her bosom, Beatrice d’Hirson said, with her eyes wide open:

- Understand, Monsignor, priests and popes in Rome and Avignon do not teach the truth. God is not alone. There are two gods: the god of light and the god of darkness, the prince of good and the prince of evil. Even before the creation of the world, the people of darkness rebelled against the people of light. And in order to be able to live, for evil is death and non-existence, the vassals of the prince of evil absorbed part of the principles of good. And since they carried both principles within themselves, both good and evil, they were able to create the world and create a person in whom good and evil were intertwined in eternal struggle. But the leading role belongs to evil, because it is an element of the creator people. It is not difficult to see that there are two principles, because there is a man and there is a woman, created different, like you and me,” she continued with a voluptuous smile. “And it is evil that tickles our bellies, prompts them to unite... And people, in whose nature evil is stronger than good, must worship Satan and enter into an alliance with him in order to be happy and succeed in business.” And they should not do anything for the prince of good - he is their enemy.

“You have more brains than I thought.” Who taught you all this?

“Former Templars,” she answered.”

So, let’s leave Beatrice d’Hirson to initiate Robert d’Artois into the secrets of “Manichaeism of the left hand” and draw a conclusion. Based on the documents discussed in this chapter, it seems absolutely impossible that there would not exist within the Order of the Temple Secret inner circle which had its own even more secret stages of initiation, where they professed a much more metaphysical Manichaeism than that preached by Beatrice d'Hirson in the bed of Robert d'Artois.

Successors of the order

At the end of this chapter the reader will inevitably raise the question of the successors of the Templars. This is more than logical. Let us say right away that in the archives of Memoirs of the Templars, an organization whose task is to find and expose all kinds of fakes and fabrications in this regard, there are many documents related to our question.

In fact from the point of view of historical science only a few of them are genuine. We will limit ourselves to only the most reliable data:

A) Order of Calatrava, founded in 1164 by King Alexander of Castile in the image of the Cistercians. After the dissolution of the Order of the Temple, officially proclaimed in the bull of Pope Clement V “Voce Clamentis”, promulgated on April 5, 1312 at the Council of Vienna, the Spanish Templars, found innocent, joined it.

b) Order of Christ, founded in 1318 by King Denis I of Portugal. It included the Portuguese Templars, also acquitted.

V) Order of St. Andrew and the Scottish Thistle, founded by King Robert Bruce of Scotland on June 24, 1314, on the day of the victory at Bannockburn, when the Scottish Templars helped him defeat the army of Edward II of England, son-in-law of Philip IV the Fair. Like the previous ones, this order still exists. It is annexed to the English crown. In the 18th century Through the mediation of some of its members, this branch of the Templars united with the Freemasons, as a result of which rituals of a number of higher degrees arose: the Scottish Old Accepted, the Scottish Corrected, the Swedish, Memphis and Misraimic series. And the cradle of the Masonic movement of that era was the famous system strict Templar obedience Baron Hund.

The accusation concerning the heretical rite of admission to the order was the most common. At the same time, it was precisely this that most of those arrested confessed to.

According to the charter and statutes of the Templar Order, the rite of admission to the order should have proceeded something like this: a chapter was assembled, at which the head of the chapter asked the brothers about objections to accepting a neophyte into the order, after which the chosen brothers went after him and talked about the hardships that he would have to endure. endure, becoming a member of the order, and also inquired about his origin, social status, etc.

Then the neophyte appeared before the chapter and the head of the chapter also had to tell him about the hardships and ask about his desire to join the order.

Then the neophyte was taken away, and if there were still no objections to his candidacy, he was again introduced into the chapter, and he took an oath on the Holy Gospel. After which the head of the chapter laid a cloak on him and kissed him on the mouth. Next, the statutes of the order were explained to the brother. This concluded the ceremony.
Following the official accusations of August 12, 1308, during the initiation rite into the Order of the Temple, the neophytes renounced Christ and desecrated the holy cross of the Lord, and also committed other acts indecent to a Christian.

Here is a description of the initiation rite, according to the testimony of Outremer's commander Rimbaud de Caron, given by him in the presence of the papal cardinals in Chinon, in August 1308: “He swore on the Holy Gospel that he would give honest and comprehensive testimony about himself and about the brothers of the order, and about the order itself on issues related to the Catholic faith and the charter of the said order, as well as about the five leaders and brothers of the order. We carefully interrogated him about the circumstances of his initiation into the order. He said that about forty-three years had passed since he became a knight and was received into the Order of the Temple in the chapel of the local Templar commandery in the city of Richarenches, in the diocese of Carpentras or Saint-Paul-Trois-Château. Chateaux) brother Roncelin de Faux, who at that time was the commander of Provence. During the ceremony, the commander did not say anything reprehensible to the neophyte, but after the initiation, a brother-sergeant approached him, whose name he does not remember, due to his long-ago death. He took him aside, holding a small cross under his cloak, and when all the brothers had gone and they were left alone, namely the brother sergeant and the witness, this brother sergeant showed him the cross. The witness did not remember whether it had a crucifix on it or not, but believed, however, that it had a picture of a crucifixion on it, either painted or carved. And this brother sergeant said to the witness, “You must disown him.” And the witness, not believing that he was committing a sin, said: “So I renounce.”

As a rule, the rite of renunciation of Christ took place after the official ceremony, when the brother was dressed in the cloak of the order; few brothers took part in it - a neophyte and several accepting brothers (who could be either sergeants or ordinary knights, or high-ranking Templars). In addition, the neophyte had to kiss the recipient on the mouth, stomach and lower spine.

In the historical community there is no consensus on this point of accusation: Jonathan Riley-Smith believes that such a custom could have taken place, in view of the state in which the order was at the beginning of the 14th century: “It is difficult to find the reasons for the penetration of such strange behavior into the great and powerful monastic order, however, it must be admitted that the interrogations of the Templars showed how poor a state it was in and how much it needed reform and reorganization.”

Malcolm Barber refutes the accusations, appealing to the materials of the trial, which record multiple cases of violence against the accused who admitted to heresy: “Now it would be difficult to prove, as some historians of the 19th century did, that the Templars actually committed the crimes that were charged against them. guilt by the regime of Philip the Fair, or that their confessions indicate something other than the weakness of a person before spiritual and physical torture, for only exceptionally strong individuals can withstand torture.”

The disagreement among historians is due to two reasons: firstly, we do not know of any evidence of the heresy of the Templars before the trial, and secondly, the trial itself was carried out with numerous violations. All this makes it possible to build endless speculation and reasoning, but does not allow us to put an end to this matter.
In addition, we have very little information about the possible reasons for the emergence of such a ritual in the order.
The most complete explanation was given by Geoffroy de Gonville during interrogations dated November 15, 1307: “They say that he was once introduced into our order by a master who was a prisoner of the Sultan, as I have already said. Some argue that this is one of the nasty and perverse additions to the charter made by Master Roncelin; there are those who believe that this is a consequence of the sinful institutions and doctrines of Master Tom Bero; and finally, still others think that this is being done following the example and in memory of St. Peter, who denied Christ three times."
Brother Bosco de Mazualier also said that allegedly in response to his question about the meaning of this ritual, Prior Bourges said that “we are talking about the prophet” and “it’s too long to explain.”

If Bosco's testimony can be understood by taking into account the sixth and seventh articles of the list of charges of August 12, which dealt with the fact that the Templars allegedly considered Christ a false prophet, then Gonville's testimony seems truly interesting for analysis. In his explanation of the initiation rite, the legends about some of the masters of the Order of the Temple, recorded by chroniclers, were developed.

Thus, the master who was captured was Gerard de Ridfort, a Templar because of whom, according to the chronicler Heraclius, the Battle of Hattin was lost. The master was one of the few Templars whom Saladin did not execute in captivity, which brought upon him some suspicions from his contemporaries that de Ridefort had converted to Islam..
Thomas Bero was considered a failure and a bad master, because during his tenure as Grand Master the order lost the largest castles of the Holy Land - Safet and Beaufort. This is probably why Brother Geoffroy included him in the list of suspected founders of heresy. The most interesting is the personality of Master Ronselin. He appears in the Chinon letter of the cardinals as the commander of Provence, and this brother was also involved in regulating relations between the English king and Simon de Montfort the Younger. Some believe that Roncelin was Master of England, but we have no evidence of this. In any case, the only document confirming Roncelin's participation in the introduction of the heretical rite is the “Book of Fire Baptism” - a document fabricated by the Freemasons to prove the existence of the secret teachings of the Templars.
Thus, Gonville's explanation unfortunately does not shed any light on the rite of initiation into the order.

The charge of indecent kissing was based on the Templar custom of kissing a neophyte on the mouth. According to the statute: “And the one who accepts him as a brother must raise him from his knees and kiss him on the mouth, and usually the brother chaplain also kisses him.”

In the early Middle Ages, a kiss on the mouth meant greeting. However, later, in the Gothic era, what happened was what one of the outstanding representatives of the Annales school, Jacques Le Goff, calls a general desacralization, that is, a new look at the world, which now focused on the visible, on the world given in sensations, instead of being only a simple symbol of hidden reality.

Over time, the Templar's kiss began to be associated with something obscene. All this allowed the royal legists to fabricate such a vile accusation.

The charges against the Templars would be difficult to explain without taking into account other famous political scandals of the early 14th century.

As Helen Nicholson writes: “The original accusations of 1307 were compiled by one Escue de Florian of Bézières, prior of Monfauco.”<...>Askew's charges were similar to those brought against leading political figures of the time, such as Pope Boniface VIII and Walter Langton.<...>Philip IV's new advisor, Guillaume de Nogaret, fabricated the following charges against Pope Boniface: he was a heretic, he practiced simony and sodomy, he was elected dishonestly, his advisor was the devil, and he believed that the French had no souls."

As can be seen from the above quotes, all these accusations were united not only by the main point - falling into heresy and renunciation of Christ, but also by participation in the case of the King of France, Philip the Fair. One can debate for a long time about the role of this monarch in these processes; only one thing remains undeniable - it was during the era of Philip IV in France that the position of the crown became extremely strengthened, and the Pope not only abandoned political influence on France, but actually found himself captured by the French king.

Thus, the charges brought against the Templars were, in essence, no different from the traditional charges of their era, but were so skillfully fabricated that, as Nicholson writes, “the weaknesses of the order were obvious, and the defense was not possible.”

The Templars were also accused of holding their capitules with extreme secrecy. This accusation has documentary justification: according to paragraph 387 of the “French Charter” of the Templars, the brothers gathered at the chapter “must take care that not a single person from the brothers of the Temple can eavesdrop when they conduct their chapter.”

This requirement is very easily explained by looking at the further clauses of the Rules (pp. 386 to 415) concerning the conduct of ordinary chapters: “When he who is in charge of the chapter has finished his service, every brother who thinks that he has sinned shall rise up and do with cap and cap what is said above, and must stand before him who presides over the chapter, and kneel once or twice, or more, and must be humble, like one who makes confession, and must say the following: “Good sir, I I ask for mercy from the Lord and the Mother of God, from you and from the brothers, for I have sinned,” and must tell about his guilt fully and truthfully, as it all happened, and he must not lie either out of shame of the flesh, or out of fear of the justice of the House; for if he lies, it will not be a confession, and let it be known that it has been established for our chapter that the brethren may confess their sins and correct them.”

After this, the head of the chapter had to tell the other brothers about his sin and discuss the punishment for him.

So, here we are dealing with the practice of general confession, which implied consciousness of sins at a general meeting in front of all those present. Such confession was practiced in the West until the IV Lateran Council (1215), which established that every Catholic must confess to a priest at least once a year.

As Marie-Anne Polo de Beaulieu writes in her work “Medieval France”: “The 21st Canon of the Fourth Lateran Council, which laid the foundation for Western Christianity, decreed that every believer secretly and personally must confess (oral confession) to the parish priest at least once a year (before Easter communion). The new demand for confession of their own sins forced believers to reveal the whole truth of their lives before the shepherd... The establishment of personal relationships between the clergy and the flock contributed to the onset of a new stage in the development of Christianity and the transition from external rituals to taking possession of the inner life of believers.”

The Templars adhered to the old rule, apparently appearing more often before the chapter than before the priest (chaplain) of the order. But they cannot be accused of apostasy from the faith. The greatest specialist of the 19th century on the history of the Inquisition, Henry Charles Lee, notes: “The Order was founded before repentance was recognized as a sacrament and entrusted to priests; at the same time, confession to another person had not yet been made mandatory. The Templars were a monastic order, and all monastic orders usually had daily or weekly chapters, at which the brothers repented of their sins; here penance was imposed on them (usually they were immediately scourged), and they received absolution from the hands of the chairman of the chapter, regardless of whether he was ordained or not. In the era of St. Thomas Aquinas, this absolution was considered significant even when it was given by a layman.”

Thus, it is completely clear that the Templars, as well as other monastic orders, did not allow outsiders to their chapters. This explains the “mystery” of the ceremony of admission to the order: at the ceremony, the neophyte had to confess his sins, which outsiders had no right to know about.